Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I would like to have the same syntax (whatever that is) for
> antlib.xml and for loose declarations in the buildfile itself.

+1 on using the same syntax, but we could restrict the version that
will be used in antlib.xml.

I.e. make both use the same name and attributes, and allow the one
used in build files to have additional attributes/child elements.
Defining a classpath in antlib.xml doesn't make too much sense IMHO.

Stefan

Reply via email to