At 10:19 AM 6/5/01 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >I've not come up with something that would be called an aspect that >would manifest itself in an attribute for things other than tasks, but >that doesn't necessarily imply that we can savely restrict >attribute-aspects to tasks. > >How much do we gain if we use a restriction like this (you know, I'm >not trying to prototype something myself)?
simplicity for user, simplicity for developer. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
