> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > At 05:18 PM 6/6/01 +0100, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > > > lieing, > > never accused you of that
Read again the message I was replying to. I cut & pasted these words from there. > > > insane, > > never accused you of that > > >tirade > > is descriptipe of your efforts. > > >I have heard your arguments I have not being convinced by > them. If you want, > >we can agree to disagree and live it at that. > > Most people would who disagree actually give reasons, the conversation > continues and solution is produced. Interesting that you > choose not to go > this path. > I have given reason to you, plenty of them. You do not accept them, fine. That is your prerogative. It won't make me loose my sleep. > >About my supposedly false statement: > > > > Try this one instead. > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <project name="test" default="devtest" basedir="."> > <target name="x"> > <broken-javac-task-reference/> > </target> > </project> > > >Imagine that, it did what I said it would. > > ooops - seems like you are wrong ... again. > Who said the above project is *syntactically* invalid? The syntax looks correct to me. Next time read my paragraphs in full. I said (paraphrazing) "you may run them with -Dyxz... if you want to check for unknown tasks", so you can. Chiao, Jose Alberto
