--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've seen frequently "ant is no good for c++", and I wonder why. I had > no trouble writing a (linux/gcc) c++ compilation for an admittedly not > enormous (about 80-90 files) project using apply for cpp > o and execon > for linking. It doesn't have the extensive lists of dependencies > sometimes found in make files, but then javac doesn't have that kind of > dependency checking either. So just why is make better?
How did you deal with header-file changes? Diane ===== ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
