Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering on which was thought to be more useful.
>
> <typedef name="javac" type="task" classname="org.apache.ant.Javac">
>
> vs
>
> <taskdef name="javac" classname="org.apache.ant.Javac">
Making up some preference syntax here
<typedef name="taskdef" type="task"
classname="org.apache.ant.core.Typedef" />
<pref name="taskdef">
<attribute name="type" default="task" />
</pref>
which means, one could make <taskdef> a specialized version of
<typedef> quite easily. I'd go for the first version.
Stefan