> -----Original Message----- > From: J�r�me Lacoste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Well the OO way has been -1'ed so we won't end up with that ;) > > OK thanks for the extensive answer. I will have to go back in > the archives > to find the reasons for why this -1 was given. I guess one of > it is the complexity. Yes I proposed this feature so that a build manager could propose an interface (or more, an abstract build)that is inherited from by all build files to avoid code duplication. and provide a consistent set of targets across builds. If the build file does not fit well, the project guys could decide to override the appropriate target. This is not possible as of now especially since targets cannot be defined twice. But maybe we could achive a somewhat similar thing via a clever use of namespace... -- St�phane Bailliez Software Engineer, Paris - France iMediation - http://www.imediation.com Disclaimer: All the opinions expressed above are mine and not those from my company.
