--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think execon is there to stay and if it just was because of the > parallel attribute. > > Whether execon and foreach could and should be based on the same code > (I'm not talking copy-paste here 8-) is a completely different issue.
Fair enough - I'm not trying to argue for the removal of execon, not at all - it just appears that the pattern may begin to proliferate into other tasks where it doesn't make as much sense, when foreach might solve those other cases more cleanly. I think we're starting to argue about how much we agree with each other. ;-) roger __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
