Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So you say you are going to -1 every solution that allows users to >> specify dependencies on the command line for Ant2 and offer >> templates as the alternative. You'd accept such a non-templating >> solution for Ant1, as long as it doesn't imply it will be present >> in Ant2. Is this correct? > > essentially ;)
In which case we are stuck with regard to Peter Vogel's patch, targets will be there in Ant2 and they will have a depends attribute - expanding properties for it in Ant1 but not for Ant2 is not an option for me. Stefan
