Craeg K Strong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adding an optional "description" element has the following advantages:
<snip/> > and disadvantages: > > -More likely to break compatibility-- the most natural way to > implement is to emulate <property> and this requires changes in many > more places... Don't think so. Just make it a new DataType (i.e. create a simple wrapper class and add the classname to the .../types/defaults.properties file) and you are done. I don't see any backwards compatibility issues here. > I personally believe that the description element is the better way to > go +1 Stefan
