http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=370
*** shadow/370 Sun May 20 17:19:59 2001 --- shadow/370.tmp.1243 Sat Jul 7 09:43:31 2001 *************** *** 1,19 **** ! Bug#: 370 ! Product: Ant ! Version: 1.2 ! Platform: PC ! OS/Version: All ! Status: UNCONFIRMED ! Resolution: ! Severity: Normal ! Priority: High ! Component: Core tasks ! AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! URL: ! Cc: ! Summary: exec and execon tasks ignore dir BugRat Report#658 ! The dir attribute does not appear to have any affect on the behavior of exec(on). Shouldn't the directory be changed before the program is called, and then changed back again after it is finished? ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-02-15 06:37 ------- --- 1,19 ---- ! +============================================================================+ ! | exec and execon tasks ignore dir BugRat Report#658 | ! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | Bug #: 370 Product: Ant | ! | Status: RESOLVED Version: 1.2 | ! | Resolution: WORKSFORME Platform: PC | ! | Severity: Normal OS/Version: All | ! | Priority: High Component: Core tasks | ! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ! | Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ! | CC list: Cc: | ! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | URL: | ! +============================================================================+ ! | DESCRIPTION | The dir attribute does not appear to have any affect on the behavior of exec(on). Shouldn't the directory be changed before the program is called, and then changed back again after it is finished? ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-02-15 06:37 ------- *************** *** 24,26 **** --- 24,32 ---- This is a problem on Windows NT 4.0 as well. It appears that the exec tasks is ignoring the dir attribute and the current directory for the command is always the current directory for the project. + + ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-07-07 09:43 ------- + Please provide more information if this problem still exists for you. + + Can not reproduce this on W2K with any version of Ant and/or JDK I have + available.
