A couple of weeks ago, the question of being able to set a property based on derefencing another property came up again. There's also a bug filed about it (#1733), and a patch was attached to it that allows for this functionality. I picked that up and tried it -- see: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-user&m=99383728324770&w=2 Think we should make it an optional task?
Also, awhile back someone wanted to be able to require a particular version of Ant, so I wrote a little <require> task. I don't know how much use it'd get, but if you think it's worth committing, I can put a doc together for it and put it through. And finally -- what should we do about the <foreach> task? Given how many times over the past couple of months people have been pointed to picking it up from the archives, should we go ahead and make it an optional task? (Or would PeterD become apopletic at the very idea? :) Diane ===== ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
