On 18 Jul 2001, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > I'm not sure what's my status, I used to have commit access on > > ant > > You still have. The list of Ant committers is quite long - maybe we > should ask all people to consider whether they want to give up their > access?
I don't know - the problem is that after a while you get disconected, that's my main reason for sending patches for "real" commiters. > As Conor is playing with the classloader quite a bit, I'm hesitant to > put your patch in right now - at least not all of it. I'd like to see > the classloader stuff to be resolved first. Well, I kind of need this - that's why I did the patch. I guess I can create a new "TempTaskdef" - and use it instead of the official taskdef. It's a bit inconvenient - I'm already doing a number of workarounds. Any half of the patch would help ( if I can load a group of tasks with the same loader I can resolve my problem ), but I think it's nice to use a single class loader for a certain classpath ( at lest for taskdefs ). BTW, what's the policy for "optional" tasks ? > > Strangely, I'm listed as author on this file > > We don't remove @author tags, even if a class has been rewritten > several times. How are you dealing with similar situations in Tomcat? I never remove @author tags. It's just an interesting experience to see a file where you are listed as author - after the code was refactored or rewritten. Costin
