On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 06:34, John.Casey wrote:
> This would be a beautiful feature to have. It adds so
> much power without adding much complexity.
>
> How would you handle the vocabulary of the test
> attribute of condition? Would you allow extensions of
> conditions, or what?
Well I was thinking that any Condition would just have to implement an
interface (say interface ItemTest {}) and they could automatically be used.
So if you needed another test you just write a
class Foo implements ItemTest {}
then register it as "foo" and then you could use the foo test ;)
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
