On Mon, 6 Aug 2001 15:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Aug 2001 15:26, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> We already have built-in tasks that have attributes and nested > >> elements of the same name (see javac with classpath). Tasks may > >> have chosen to do different things with them (javac does, but this > >> is silly). > > > > but they are still differentiable .. you said so as much below ;) > > I did?
I could be wrong but thats what it sounded like to me ;) > If the method for nested <classpath> elements in <javac> becomes > setClasspath(Path), how can it be distinguished from the attribute > setter? parameter type. > Maybe you are advocation Path[] as the argument for setters of nested > elements? I think so ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
