Of course we can wait. Nothing is carved in stone. :-)

-- 
 St�phane Bailliez 
 Software Engineer, Paris - France 
 iMediation - http://www.imediation.com 
 Disclaimer: All the opinions expressed above are mine and not those from my
company. 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 3:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Source code Audit / Clean up
> 
> 
> Stephane,
> 
> Can we wait for the 1.4 release to finish? I don't want to do 
> this on the
> 1.4 Branch and it will make the merge back to the main branch more
> difficult. Nothing I couldn't handle, I believe, but not 
> really something
> we have to do now. I think we have a lot of work after 1.4 
> release to go
> through the patches that have been coming in and that would 
> be the best
> time to do this cleanup.
> 
> Cheers
> Conor
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephane Bailliez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 10:50 PM
> Subject: Source code Audit / Clean up
> 
> 
> 
> I expect to do some big cleanup this week end on the source 
> code unless I'm
> notified not to do so.
> 
> This will(ok, should) not have any impact on the source code 
> integrity.
> 
> - Clean up duplicate or unnecessary imports on source code.
> 
> - Replace * import by explicit imports
> 
> - Put single if/then/for/while statement enclosed in a block. That is:
> if (xxxx)
>  statement();
> 
> will be replaced by:
> 
> if (xxxx) {
>  statement();
> }
> 
> this is to avoid:
> if (xxxxx)
>   statement1();
>   statement2();
> 
> Which can be more than misleading in a debug session if you 
> are not looking
> at this from a different perspective.
> 
> All this will be done automatically.
> 
> If you are OK with this...just express yourself :)
> to do in ANT_14_BRANCH ?
> 
> --
>  St�phane Bailliez
>  Software Engineer, Paris - France
>  iMediation - http://www.imediation.com
>  Disclaimer: All the opinions expressed above are mine and 
> not those from
> my
> company.
> 
> 

Reply via email to