> From: Stephane Bailliez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Ummm. I wasn't really hoping for a "great deal of modification" in the
> > beta
> > :-) Oh well, we will now require a second beta, I guess.
>
> "Great deal" in this case is mostly considered as "bugfixconsolidation" to
> me...

If it is required, it is required. No problems. I did anticipate more than
one Beta in the original release plan. I will build a second Beta on
Thursday.

> If you feel it is dangerous

I leave it up to you to decide :-)

>
> I did not do the changes in the main branch on purpose (unless I did
> something wrong, in this case I have no excuses),

No, my fault - misread the cvs commit mail - apologies.

Conor

Reply via email to