PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3262

*** shadow/3262 Fri Aug 24 10:31:12 2001
--- shadow/3262.tmp.21482       Fri Aug 24 10:31:12 2001
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,29 ----
+ +============================================================================+
+ | Problems with relative paths in the builddir attrib of project             |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |        Bug #: 3262                        Product: Ant                     |
+ |       Status: NEW                         Version: 1.4Beta2                |
+ |   Resolution:                            Platform: PC                      |
+ |     Severity: Minor                    OS/Version: Windows NT/2K           |
+ |     Priority: Other                     Component: Core                    |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |  Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   |
+ |  Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                    |
+ |      CC list: Cc:                                                          |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |          URL:                                                              |
+ +============================================================================+
+ |                              DESCRIPTION                                   |
+ Upgrading from Ant1.3, to Ant1.4Beta2, a build file with the following 
project 
+ tag stopped working:
+ 
+ <project name="ANOther" default="buildall" basedir=".\..">
+ 
+ It seems the basedir attrib no longer works with relative paths.  If set to 
an 
+ absolute value (e.g. basedir="c:\projects\another") everything is OK.
+ 
+ Is this expected behaviour - I found the following from the Ant website but 
am 
+ not sure if it is relevant :
+ 
+ "Ant will no longer use the canonical version of a path internally - this may 
+ yield different results on filesystems that support symbolic links"

Reply via email to