On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 20:38, Paul Hammant wrote: > Peter, > > >>Please give it a sanity test. If you think this build is suitable to be > >>adopted as the 1.4 release then please reply with a +1. > > > >Seems to work so far .. haven't fully tested it yet. One thing though ... > > why are we still distributing optional.jar separately ? > > You mean as opposed to rolling the it's contents into ant.jar ?
Naah - more like why is it not kept in optional.jar but optional.jar is included in main ant release instead of forcing users to download two products. > I also > think that each taskdef should be in a seperate jar (with some > antbase.jar providing common code), but that too is controvercial I guess. Similar to what was talked about in context of Ant2. -- Cheers, Pete ----------------------------------------------------------- "Remember, your body is a temple; however, it's also your dancehall and bowling alley" -- Dharma Montgomery -----------------------------------------------------------
