I also sent a patch to the list available from the following link. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09475.html
I believe this patch is better because it eliminates I/O and avoid unnecessary filtering. As a matter of fact, I've been very wondering why the previous author and every patch sender like to do "massagePCLI" and to check the filename on returned file list from PCLI. Why does "massagePCLI" necessary? It returns appropreate filenames, so that I don't think filtering is necessary. Also, I can not understand why "createFolders" checks the format of filename. PCLI returns non-zero code if terminated with an error. Otherwise, it returns a file list. Therefore, if PCLI does not fail, the format of a file list should be correct and I think filtering is not necessary. If PCLI fails, Ant stops build task. Do you have any idea? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 6:44 AM Subject: [PATCH] Ant pvcs task & Bug 3219 > Hello, > > I have used the pvcs task and have come up with a patch that > I believe will address Bug ID 3219 in a slightly more flexible > way, and also allows the archive filename extension to vary > from the format hardcoded in the createFolders() method in > Pvcs.java
