On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 01:21, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > I agree in general. I think, however, once we adopt this mechanism we > > would almost immediately need to handle name collisions in the <task> > > and <datatype> definitions. Your proposal does not cater for this. > > One simple proposal would be as you say, to allow aliasing:
+1 to aliasing -- Cheers, Pete ------------------------------------------------- "Sometimes its better to keep your mouth shut and let people think your an idiot, than to open it and remove all doubt." -------------------------------------------------
