Bill Burton wrote:
Of course you're right, but nevertheless there may be an issue. I have not testedCraeg K Strong wrote:
One case you may not have considered is that of emulation environments: Under Cygwin in Windows, one can use UNIX-style file system names. Cygwin is quite popular, but I am sure there are other such environments (for example, VMware)....
In the case of Cygwin, this is a non issue because the JVM isn't built against the Cygwin libraries. As a result, it has no knowledge of the Cygwin UNIX-like path enhancements but can only understand what it already knows about paths under Windows
this lately (we have been moving away from Cygwin/win32 in favor of Linux)
but I believe if you run ant from a bash shell under Cygwin on windows,
you get a different value from "os.name" than you do if you run ant from a DOS box.
Can someone with access to a Cygwin/Windoze box verify this? I want to make sure I wasn't under the influence of too many
chocolate-covered espresso beans! :-)
--Craeg
