On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Not sure where the code comes from. It could be just stuff that was
> inherited as ant evolved or it may be that someone wanted to extend
> property to set user properties or something.

<ant> uses this for the properties set as nested <property> elements -
but in fact it never calls execute on the objects, so the value of the
userProperty attribute will never be used.

Seems as if it could be removed, but I'm probably missing something.

Stefan

Reply via email to