> I'd say (2) also for the sake of compatibility even though I believe this
> should not be too problematic for users to upgrade from 3.6 to 3.7... If
the
> user can upgrade to Ant 1.5 I see no reasons for not upgrading to JUnit
3.7+
> at the same time. :)

If you plan to release 1.4.2 then I would go for (1) as a bugfix release
should not
break existing functionality. But for 1.5 or even 2.0, I would not choose
the slow
reflection, instead use the getName() method.

Just my 2 cents,

Ingmar Stein

Reply via email to