From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > We need to define the scope of command-line properties. ie. (3) is > > still a hierarchy. > > I'd say command line properties and properties passed into subbuilds > via nested <property> tags should have the nested scope of (1). > Yes. But this only is true is we also enforce inmutability and non-inheritance on <ant> calls. Otherwise they would have to be treated as a different concept, I think.
I am just trying to state the interrelationship between the different decisions. Jose Alberto
