On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 21:21, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2001 00:53, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > if( node is one of "import", "projectref" or "aspect" ) > >> > >> Hardcoded element names inside the parser? > > > > much like project/tarrget are hardcoded. > > Project and Target translate into Ant's object model directly, I'm not > sure the same is true for the things you mention.
Well I think they do and in fact have modeled them as part of project model in proposal. (with the exception of aspect which I am still not decided on). I am interested to hear why you doon't consider them part of the model. > Anyway, we are not really talking about tasks here, but about > something that needs a lot closer coupling to the core, as close as > the parser itself. I think I can live with hardcoding these things in > the parser, as any extension of Ant's core that has different needs > here, will probably use a parser of its own. > > Back to tasks and types - I sense consensus building up for "allow > everything to live outside of targets". hello script land! -- Cheers, Pete ----------------------------------------------------------- "Remember, your body is a temple; however, it's also your dancehall and bowling alley" -- Dharma Montgomery ----------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
