On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but since backward compatibility is necessary, I could create the > chgrp and chown tasks (simple copies of chmod) and integrate the 3 > in the chrights task.
As there is no single chgrp task, there is no need for having a separate task IMHO. Do you exepect chrights to use a similar sytax like chmod did? If so, we could get away with making chmod an alias name for chrights (and issue a deprecation warning if somebody uses that name). > d) Let's deprecate the chown and go for the chrights Yes. > 2) If everyone prefers a or c, I would prefer to minimize code and > execute the task chmod/chown/chgrp from the chrights task. Don't know whether this actually is necessary, see above. > but couldn't find a clean way to do that from my code. There are a couple of tasks that do similar things, see how <genkey> (ab)uses <exec> for example. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
