Steve, Can you hold off until after this weekend. This whole area is part of my original experiment to eliminate the front end scripts. So, it has a slightly different motivation from Jose Alberto's patch but did many of the same things. I would like to look at Jose Alberto's patch a bit more. The whole concept of the coreloader is not fully set yet, so it may be best to hang off for now.
Conor > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 9 November 2001 10:48 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] No need for CLASSPATH in ANT1 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 07:13 > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] No need for CLASSPATH in ANT1 > > >correctly written tasks should be using at least something like: > > > > URLClassLoader classLoader = new URLClassLoader( myURLs, > > this.getProject().getCoreLoader() ); > > > >this is why I considered that such tasks were broken as oppose of we > changing things. > > I am going to add this to the task guidelines, and link to the > network copy > of the doco from the developing with ant page. > > I notice that Project doesnt actually set its coreloader -something else > does that in the ant specific coreloader situation, right? > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
