Ah! Ok, so I have missed a bit. :) zipfileset doesn't allow fileset-ish includes/excludes, though, does it? It looks like if this was added, then jlink would be completely deprecated. And it also looks like I have been duplicating work that Conor already did with Manifest. Ok, I'll see if anything needs to be done with Jar/Manifest to do what I'm trying to do. -Brian
Oh, the OS was added for Mac, but supposedly this was fairly old and felt it could be taken out. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: jlink code question > > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Brian Deitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > IMHO, jlink isn't a bad addition, > > It's not bad as such, just the way it is currently maintained (or not) > is. > > > but maybe I've missed additions to zipfileset. > > You sure have 8-) > > > I have recieved an off-list email from the original writers and have > > found out the processEntry piece was there for OS-issues. I'll just > > make it an optional attribute. > > Do you know which OS this has been added for? > > > When I submit stuff in for merging manifests, however, it should > > become a bit more unique. > > Even that functionality may be easier to achieve with Conor's Manifest > class that is the foundation for <jar>'s new and improved manifest > handling. > > Stefan > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
