> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > but obviouslly there is absolutely 0 interest to maintain the > > support for AdaptX and XSL:P in style task. > > I'm not sure, want to poll ant-user?
Will do that. > Why do you think there was no support for AdaptX? 1) no mention on Exolab pages of AdaptX AFAIK 2) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=adaptx+exolab is self explanatory Who is using AdaptX but Intalio (ie Exolab ?) If it is the case as Arnaud said, it will implement TraX anyway http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09929.html I don't see the need to put an AdaptX task for Ant 1.5 just to remove it shortly after, it has really no value unless there is an enormous demand from users. Putting an XT task is much more valuable since it is still the fastest Java xsl processor on Earth AFAIK, the community for XT is way larger obviouslly than the AdaptX one. Unless of course AdaptX is way faster than XT which would justify adding AdaptX in Ant. Stephane. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
