On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you refactor your test that uses unsetProperty to do it a > different way?
done. > Is there any other use-case for having an unsetProperty method? There is an enhancement request in bugzilla that asks for this functionality, even using a built-in task instead of using a Java API. Anyway, I've never announced the unsetProperty method and I've added it after the 1.4.1 release, so removing it now should be save IMHO. > Would it be ok to return back a copy of the properties hashtable > rather than the actual object? Works for me. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
