On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:50, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 01:30, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > > Not that I following too close what you are doing in myrmidon, but > > > wouldn't Task.getName() be associated in peoples minds with > > > Task.setName() ? The later being the method for processing an attribute > > > named "name". > > > > Neither getName() nor setName() will be present in the end Task API (Nor > > will there be setTaskType/getTaskType()). Names are something that a > > container manages and thus the only way for a task to even know about > > them is to grab it from the TaskContext. > > I am talking about the task's methods, like: > > <property name="xyz" value="foo" /> > > this is provided by a task having methods: > > public void setName(String x); > public void setValue(String y); > > unless you are changing that. > > As I said, I am not following too close, but is your getName() part of the > interface implemented by tasks? This is what I was trying to point out.
Ahh - now I get you. Well as it stands I don't think we will be allowing any objects to actually reference the task object itself. They will either be operating through a the proxy interface (itf they are a "foreign" task) or acting via a simplified facade. -- Cheers, Pete ----------------------------------------------- "You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." -Mark Twain ----------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
