Re: [Fwd: RE: Dependency analysis]

[Mark McMillan]

Oh, I missed the extra dependency you added.  Yes, I think that would work, 
although I don't like the way it will make the build file very fragmented 
(for some one to figure out what ALL does, they have to find and examine 
each dependency rather than just read what is inside the ALL target).  I 
prefer the clarity of the <do> task, but I see how it could be done just 
using dependencies.

-Mark
At 09:25 AM 12/18/01, you wrote:
On Tue, 2001-12-18 at 13:49, Mark McMillan wrote:
>
> >Can you not do something like:
> >
> ><target name="all" depends="init, compile, prep_work, borland,
> >weblogic"/>
>
> Almost, but if the 'all' target needs to do some processing before the
> 'borland' and 'weblogic' targets run, then it cannot do it.
>
I was allowing for the extra processing in the 'prep_work' target. Would
that not work?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>