> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephane Bailliez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wannheden, Knut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [...] > > Are there any plans to add UCM support to the current tasks > > or are there > > good reasons not to do so. If there is a need for this I'd > > be happy to help > > doing some of the work. > > Current CC tasks are too lightweight for real uses. I would > like to add a > fileset capability for mass checkin/checkout/add to source > control and a > simili synctree/clearfsimport a little bit more flexible. >
I guess it depends on what you deem to be "real uses". I guess the most common use of SCM support in the build system is to deploy new builds, which usually only requires a checkout and a checkin. But of course filesets and especially "add to source control" would be very handy. > The problem is that doing this in Java requires a huge amount > of code since > we have to deal with cleartool. It is far more simple to do > it in perl. :-( > Yes, that's true, but most actions would probably not require that much interaction with cleartool. I will probably implement some UCM features anyway (unless it's been done already) and use them on my system, and if there is any interest I'd be happy to post them. Regards, Knut Wannheden.
