From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Oh I do not mind having classes that do the syntactic verification > if the default Java classes do not. That I think it is fine. Where > I have a problem is when we try to go beyond syntax into semantics.
Differentiating between syntactic and semantic validations make sense in client-server/servlet-EJB environments. But why should we be differentiating between them in Ant? After all, if we do not do semantic validation during 'setting' tme, it is going to be performed (hopefully) in the execute method - there are no multiple layers involved here (at least ATM). Do you suggest against doing semantic validations during 'setting' time because you envision Ant being used in some sort of a client-server env where setters are called by the client and execute is called by the server? Or is it something else? > > Jose Alberto > Magesh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
