From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To me it seems like an ugly hack to get around limitations of ant1.x -
while
> it may be possible to implement this style funcitonality in Ant2 - I don't
> think it will be done this way or even readily supported by committers.
So even though you consider it a hack for Ant1.x would adding this
capability be rejected or allowed? (I wasn't sure which version of Ant you
meant when you said it wouldn't be readily supported)
I don't personally consider it a 'hack' as it seems to add a lot of dynamic
capability, but only if the task itself is asking for it (by implementing
DynamicConfigurator).
This is one of the biggest peeves I have against JSP Taglibs.... all their
attributes must be defined in a TLD file. It makes some sense in that
proper attributes are determined at page compilation time, but also
restricts the flexibility of taglibs IMO.
Will Ant2 allow dynamically defined attributes/elements? If so, by what
mechanism?
Thanks,
Erik
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
