in the same topic: What do we do about AdaptX and XSL:P liaisons ?
We spoke a while back about removing them, while this will sure cause no arm about AdaptX since there is no official release, (though I think you had a deal with Arnaud about AdaptX so I would not want to put you in a bad position) What about XSL:P then ? There have been lengthy discussions about deprecating, deprecating more and deprecating even more and then switch to Ant 2.0. So I guess that the status is nothing should be done but deprecating even more without doing anything, right ? :) Stephane > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: removing some classes > > > Hi, > > there are some classes in Ant's CVS tree that have never been anything > but dead code in any released version of Ant AFAIK, in particular: > > org.apache.tools.ant.Constants > org.apache.tools.ant.DesirableFilter > org.apache.tools.ant.Launcher > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.CompileTask > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.JavacOutputStream > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.ManifestFile > > As people new to Ant may get confused by them (we had people refer to > Launcher as Ant's entry point), I'd like to zap them. Any problems > with this? > > There are some other classes that have become dead code later, > especially in Ant 1.2 when we switched to the newer execution > framework, i.e. > > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Exec > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Jikes > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.JikesOutputParser > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.TaskOutputStream > > Instead of removing them (I think there are some people who still > extend Exec) I'd like to add some even more annoying warnings to them. > > Stefan > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
