On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 22:57, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > OK, I may be using the term aspect wrongly. What I > meant was that the user could write something like > this to solve the conflict: > > <task1> > <a/> > <b ant:role="task" /> > </task1> > > 'ant:role' is not an attribute for the task, but for > the confgurator to know how to resolve the conflict. > I thought this is a use of aspect, the same way we > have discussed how to deal with failonerror (i.e., > ant:failonerror="true").
Thats one way of doing but then you are back to declaring roles of all elements (because you never know when a clash can occur). -- Cheers, Pete ---------------------------------------------- Money is how people with no talent keep score. ---------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
