On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:27, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unfortunately the best first-cut was largely ignored by ant-dev > > because it was a non-committer who submitted it. > > I guess you are talking about antfarm.
yup ;) > > Then Stefan said he would no try to block anything unless it really > > sucked - however he wouldn't support or work on anything until it > > was ready to go. > > until *he* was ready to go. 8-) oh - must have missed that bit :) > > Another way to do this (and the standard way for java applications) > > is via the JDK1.3 "Optional Packages" Specification. > > Slow down a little, we are just leaving JDK 1.1 compatibility with > Ant2. It does not have any requirements on a JDK1.3 JVM - it is just described there ... evolution of earlier "Extension" spec. It could be implemented fine on a jdk1.1 if you wanted. -- Cheers, Pete *------------------------------------------------* | Trying is the first step to failure. | | So never try, Lisa - Homer Jay Simpson | *------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
