On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Conor MacNeill wrote: > The obvious candidates. IMHO are myrmidon and mutant. Other candidates > may emerge in the discussion period. I do not believe we should include > Ant 1.x as an option but again let us discuss.
I think Ant1.x should be an option ( because that's what I would vote for). I'm not an active ant commiter curently, but if my vote still counts it'll be -1 on any candidate that doesn't have a clear backward compatibility plan built into the design - i.e it should be able to run most existing ant tasks and provide wrappers between the new APIs and the old ones ( like xalan compat package for example ). > [+1] Timetable - vote on or shortly after the 6th Feb > > [-1] Codebase adoption is by majority approval I don't think the vote should be on a codebase, but broken by features/patterns ( allowing to select by vote what's best in the 2 codbases ). This would also require the 2 codebases to provide a clear list of 'what's different from ant1 and why' - especially in build.xml semantic and the task interface. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
