On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Tim Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So what core tasks would rely on non-included jars?
I have no idea. Maybe the core itself would rely on non-included jars, it all depends on our packaging policy. Say we'd decide to use stuff from jakarta-avalon or jakarta-commons or jakarta-bcel or whatever, I'm not sure we'd include a jar with the distribution (we may or we may not). > And if they're core tasks (meaning useful to darn near everybody, > right?), why not include those jars in the Ant binaries? Maybe the license of that other jar doesn't allow us to do (this is true for a couple of Sun libs AFAIK). > I would think anything that's in core should run out of the box. I think, I agree 8-) > And any antlib should include the jars it relies on No, this will lead to version mismatches all over the place. > - or at least fail with a clear error message stating where to get > the right jar Yep. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
