----- Original Message -----
From: "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Let's say a setter method sets a protected member
> variable. Changing the protected member variable
> name in Ant1 would not be possible.
The protected member argument is well-taken and not something I considered.
> +1, but how to achieve that in a consistent manner in Ant1
> while at the same time satisfy Quality Analyzer?
We don't have any mandate to satisfy QA do we? We should probably only
modify code that we're touching for other purposes, generally speaking, and
not go modify code just to satisfy QA.
Erik
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
