Nope, no reason.... I was just following along with the standard pattern
I've seen in other places for that particular patch.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:32 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs
CopyTest.java
> > ehatcher 02/02/04 16:56:00
> >
> > Modified: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Copy.java
> > src/etc/testcases/taskdefs copy.xml
> > src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs CopyTest.java
>
>
> > if (srcFiles.length > 0) {
> > if (file == null) {
> > - file = new File(srcFiles[0]);
> > + file = new File(ds.getBasedir(),
srcFiles[0]);
> > filesets.removeElementAt(0);
> > } else {
> > throw new BuildException(
>
> Any specific reason why FileUtils.resolveFile is not
> being used instead of new File(...)?
>
> Cheers,
> Magesh
>
> ****************************************************
> * Atom Bomb: An invention to end all inventions. *
> ****************************************************
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
