----- Original Message ----- From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Magesh, > > I think you missed Bruce's point. Consider this scenario: > > You are given a build file. It uses some deprecated features. You are asked > to bring it up to date. If the documentation doesn't specify what the > deprecated features do, how can you confidently make the changes. You use ant-update.xsl and you're done in 10 seconds :-] > I agree with Bruce. Documentation should reflect the code. > If a feature is in the code, it should be in the documentation > If a feature is deprecated in the code, it should be marked as deprecated in > the documentation but it should still be described. Good point though. Stephane -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
