On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 22:28, Stephane Bailliez wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I can't recall if this has been rejected before but I going to propose it > > again ;) > > It is my understanding that no one ever wanted this (though I have no > opinion but a need too and this has been a RFE from many users). I thought > it was you that were originally -1 for this. :-)
I probably would have if it had been implemented as an antcall rather than as a container ;) > is that the <tbody> that would be the <try-catch-finally> element ? yep. -- Cheers, Pete -------------------------------------------------- Logic: The art of being wrong with confidence... -------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
