From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 03:07, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > Proxys need to be there also (optionally) so that we > > can do what TaskAdapter does AND more importantly, try > > to solve the type inconsistency issue between > > TaskContainers and Datatypes that now is solved by > > accident. > > Blech - dont like adapters at all. I guess we can chalk this up to ant1.x > legacy but it still feels ungainly to me :( I would prefer we just ignore the > DataTypes inconsistency and just try not to introduce anymore inconsistencies. >
We still have TaskAdapter which converts beans into Tasks. So the concept is still there, and given the rules of ANT1 is there to stay :( > No I was more thinking that you could grab a FileSet object, add a new > pattern to it and this new pattern would appear in parent project. That makes > me feel icky. I guess this is already possible with inheriting datatypes via > ant/antcall - yuck. Hmm we haven't released that maybe we should consider > zapping support for it ? :) Oh, I have not muck around with the properties and references symbol tables, those could be next :) I am just talking about taskdef and typedef registries. And you are right, given the current (old) <ant> it could be mutated. Jose Alberto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
