> From: Tim Vernum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Similar to what I prototyped except with a syntax that did away with
> > getters. Essentially it was simplified to just
> >
> > <scriptdef name="scripttest" language="javascript">
> > <param name="test" default="hello"/>
>
> +1
>
My motivation was to make scripted tasks somewhat similar to a real task, as
would be written in Java, particularly when using Rhino. I thought that would
make it useful for quickly prototyping a task for later development in Java and
also to introduce people to task development.
In addition, the way I implemented <scriptdef> it can support nested elements,
which are potentially repeated
<scriptedTask>
<fileset ...>
<fileset ...>
</scriptedTask>
It is hard to support that capability with simple named parameters.
Thoughts?
Conor
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
