From: "Tim Vernum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Bruce Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > What I think you are really saying is > > that you WANT to be able to fold patterns together. > > What I read Conor to be saying was: > > * There is at least one example of a buildfile that relies > on the current behaviour > > * There is a "reasonable" (*) use case for the current > behaviour. > > Both of which suggest that any change is going to be a > nightmare for backwards compatiblity. >
Not if we do what we did for <ant> and inheritAll or what we have done elsewere, we added a compatibility flag defaulted to the old behaviour. Jose Alberto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
