> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Jon Skeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I guess with only 33 occurrences at the moment it's not going to > > make too much difference. > > Then leave it in. If it hasn't been an issue so far, we obviously can > live with it.
Right. That seems the best strategy given the other message I've just posted. I think the number of people building JavaDocs themselves (with 1.1) is vastly outweighed by the number of people who use the prebuilt docs, so getting those prebuilt docs as good as possible (without going over the top and using 1.4-only features, of course) makes sense to me. > > Out of interest, I can't remember whether a decision has been made > > about what the requirements for Ant2 are - might everything get > > bumped up to Java2 at that stage? > > JDK 1.2 Goodo :) Jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
