On 20 Feb 2002, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I'm not sure that we really want to solve the classloader problems in > Ant 1 - and if we really can without breaking backwards compatibility.
I don't agree with not fixing something based on some speculations about the future - ant2 doesn't exist. Adding 'named' class loaders is a good idea IMHO ( we have named classpaths, each can be easily associated with a single class loader instance ). Adding some 'predefined' or automatic named loaders may not be needed, neither 'adding class to a named loader at runtime'. I think a 'small steps' solution would be better - what about implementing the 'named loaders' first. I have some experience with loaders, and I think that would solve most current problems. The antlib/ autoloading, etc can then be controlled explicitely. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
