----- Original Message -----
From: "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If you think I have failed in my attempt
> to get through my point of view,
> I will degrade my vote to +0. I can live
> with a prefix attribute. And I can
> always code up a <loadproperties> task
> when I need one ;-)
Thank you. I do understand your point and do agree that the generalized
approach to morphing files is indeed a very useful thing to have - I just
think its too generalized for this specific issue.
My primary use-case for prefixing properties loaded is to do something with
<propertyfile> where build numbers (or minor version number, etc) are
incremented and then immediately available as a property, but it could not
be loaded because a previous property with the same name was used to store
the old number.
It'll be a few days before I get around to doing this.
Erik
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
